Speaker
Description
After the Croatian national termbase, Struna ceased to receive funding in 2019, we began developing a novel model for compiling terminological collections that will not rely on field experts to provide initial terminological information. A potential solution to our issue of finding a practical and dependable source for obtaining information in the initial stages of processing terminology (i.e., the ‘raw definitions’) across multiple domains could be the
publicly available AI language model developed by OpenAI known as GPT-4.
GPT is a substantial language model that offers a range of capabilities, including answering queries, generating text, and executing tasks like translation and summarization. A custom GPT is currently being devised as an aid module, delivering unprocessed information for terminological units that will be processed in Struna. The initial training phase involved manually providing guidelines for best practices in terminology management, which were designed based on the well-established and successful methodology we used to train field experts in the past. The second phase involves feeding TermAI with modified data that was exported from Struna. In this paper, we will present the results of the comparative analysis of generated terminological units from TermAI and field experts in the domain of forensic sciences.
